Why Does Hamlet Act Essay Research Paper

Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot

Premium Partner
From $18.00 per page
4,8 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,80
Delivery
4,90
Support
4,70
Price
Recommended Service
From $13.90 per page
4,6 / 5
4,70
Writers Experience
4,70
Delivery
4,60
Support
4,60
Price
From $20.00 per page
4,5 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,50
Delivery
4,40
Support
4,10
Price
* All Partners were chosen among 50+ writing services by our Customer Satisfaction Team

Why Does Hamlet Act Essay, Research Paper

Why Does Hamlet Act ?

Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot

Premium Partner
From $18.00 per page
4,8 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,80
Delivery
4,90
Support
4,70
Price
Recommended Service
From $13.90 per page
4,6 / 5
4,70
Writers Experience
4,70
Delivery
4,60
Support
4,60
Price
From $20.00 per page
4,5 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,50
Delivery
4,40
Support
4,10
Price
* All Partners were chosen among 50+ writing services by our Customer Satisfaction Team

In the first act of Shakespeare s Hamlet, the young prince learns that his father,

King Hamlet (who has been dead for two months), was murdered by Claudius, Hamlet s

uncle, who is now the new king. Near the end of Act I, the ghost of king Hamlet appears

before his son to inform him of this foul, strange, and unnatural treachery. The ghost

tells Hamlet that Claudius poured poison in his ear as he lay sleeping. Finally, the ghost

commands Hamlet to avenge the murder. Remember me, the ghost says, departing.

At first, Hamlet appears more than willing to comply. He is already upset that

Claudius has married Gertrude, his mother. Moreover, Hamlet intimates that he already

suspected some kind of treachery. When the ghost relates what Claudius has done, Hamlet

utters, O, my prophetic soul! Then, in a moment of passion, Hamlet vows to sweep

to his revenge. For most of the play, however, he does not sweep to anything. In Act II,

we learn that two months have passed since the ghost told Hamlet of Claudius treachery.

Hamlet does finally kill Claudius, but not until the end of the last act. Knowing this,

many readers have asked the question, why does Hamlet delay? Of course killing Claudius

in Act II makes for a very short play. With this aside , however, a number of different

interpretations have been offered to account for Hamlet s inaction, including one by the

character himself, which I believe is at least as relevant as any other.

It is not clear what has happened during the two months since Hamlet spoke with

his father s ghost, but it is clear that Hamlet is aware that he has not taken action. In Act

II, he raises the question whether his inaction is a sign that he is a coward. He does not,

however, pursue this question. Instead, he tells himself that he must be sure the ghost was

not a manifestation of the devil, tempting him to commit a mortal sin. If Claudius did not

murder his father, then killing him will damn his soul. To resolve the question, Hamlet

devises a plan to test the truth of the ghost s story. He arranges for the performance of a

scene from The Murder of Gonzago , a play depicting a murder very similar to the on the

ghost related. The play s the thing, Hamlet says to himself, Wherein I ll catch the

conscience of the King.

Hamlet wants to make sure that his own observations are accurate, so he asks for

help from his friend Horatio, a prudent man, not passion s slave, who already knows the

story the ghost has told. Horatio is the first to suggest to Hamlet that the ghost could be

an agent of the devil. Hamlet ask Horatio to watch him, to observe how Claudius reacts

during the play, especially when one player pretends to pour poison into the ear of a

king fast asleep. As it turns out, when this does happen, Clouds stands up abruptly,

exclaiming, Give me some light. Away!

After Clouds leaves the room, Hamlet checks with Horatio, who confirms that

Claudius did act like a guilty man. Still, although Horatio s observation appears to

convince Hamlet of Claudius guilt, he does not follow his uncle out of the room. Why he

does not do so is not clear. Perhaps he does not want to kill Claudius at all, or at least not

for his father s sake. Perhaps this is why he has delayed for two months. Finally, however,

it is not clear at this point clear at this point is that Hamlet remains in the room speaking

with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, friends from school, who are actually spies for

Claudius.

Eventually, Hamlet is approached by Polonius, a busy-body who has come to tell

Hamlet that his mother wants to see him in her bed chamber. On his way there, however,

he comes across Claudius praying. Although his uncle s guilt is no longer in question, even

now Hamlet does not strike (and not just because the play will be over if he does). Hamlet

reasons that if he were to kill him during prayer (or in any state of grace), Claudius will go

to heaven. This is not revenge, Hamlet concludes (in an aside ). He must wait until

Claudius is fit and seasoned for a passage to hell, not heaven. He must wait until he

finds him in a state of unrepented sin.

Although we know that Claudius has not repented, Hamlet does not know this.

Based on what he sees, his inaction is sensible, at least given his belief about dying in a

state of grace. Later, as Hamlet is speaking roughly to his mother in her chamber, he hears

a voice cry out from behind an arras, where Polonius is hiding. Believing that it is

Claudius, Hamlet stabs through the arras without hesitation, killing Polonius. This is an

important scene because it undermines some interpretations for Hamlet s delay. Some

critics have argued, for example, that Hamlet is incapable of action because he thinks too

much. Although this theory could account, perhaps, for Hamlet s inaction up this point,

the fact that he strikes swiftly now undermines the interpretation that Hamlet is too

intellectual to act. The swiftness of his action in his mother s chamber undermines other

interpretations as well, such as that he does not want to kill Claudius at all, or that he is a

coward, or that he is worried about what the people will think of him.

Another theory advanced by some critics is that Hamlet cannot commit an act of

vengeance because it is a pagan act. Hamlet is constrained, these critics argue, by his

Christian faith. There is no doubt that Hamlet does believe in some Christian tenets, such

as the existence of heaven and hell. It appears, however, that he subscribes to the Old

Testament tenet of an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, rather than to the injunction of

Jesus Christ, which is not to kill anyone ever for any reason. Hamlet strikes without the

slightest hesitation when he believes that he has found Claudius in a state of sin. Whether

Claudius presence in the bedchamber of his wife is actually a sin is not the point. Hamlet

believes that his presence is a sin because he believes the marriage between Claudius and

Gertrude is unnatural, even corrupt.

After Hamlet learns that he has killed Polonius by mistake, he still does not kill

Claudius probably because his former reason for waiting still applies. Claudius is still in a

state of grace, having repented his previous sins, or so Hamlet believes. Again, the fact

that Claudius did not repent his sins as he knelt in prayer is not the point. Hamlet believes

that he did, so he cannot kill him yet, and let Claudius go to heaven.

Arguably, it is not until the final scene of the final act that Hamlet, in his mind,

catches Claudius undoubtedly in a state of sin. After Claudius fails in one plot to kill

Hamlet, he summons the young prince to court, where he essentially commands Hamlet to

engage in a duel with Laertes, the son of Polonius. Laertes wants to avenge his own

father s death, and Claudius is more than eager for this to happen. Indeed, to make sure

that Hamlet dies, Claudius poisons the tip of Laertes sword as well as poisons a cup of

wine for Hamlet to drink. In the end, it is Gertrude who drinks the wine, shortly before

Hamlet is wounded by Laertes. Before Gertrude dies, she announces that she is poisoned.

Laertes then relates that Hamlet too is doomed and that Claudius is to blame. Hearing all

this, Hamlet immediately strikes Claudius with Laertes sword. Claudius dies shortly

before Hamlet dies, and the play is all but over.

It is possible that Hamlet kills Claudius at this point because he knows that this is

the last chance he will have, once he knows that he himself is about to die. This

interpretation still cannot account, however, for the fact that Hamlet strikes swiftly in his

mother s bedchamber. Nor can the interpretation that Hamlet suffer from an Oedipus

complex that, subconsciously, Hamlet desires his mother sexually. The extension of this

theory is that Hamlet wanted to kill his own father, who stood in the place he desires.

Therefore, Hamlet cannot bring himself to kill Claudius because Claudius has done no

more than what Hamlet himself wants to do, which is to kill his father and marry his

mother (and become king?).

I am convinced that the Oedipus theory works here. Hamlet does in fact try to kill

Claudius. The theory says he cannot. The theory can explain why he delays, but not why

he does act. It is a fact that Gertrude is present in both instances when hamlet acts swiftly

to mortally strike Claudius. In each of these instances when Hamlet s own interpretation

works at least as well as any other. In Hamlet s mind, in each case, Claudius is in a state of

unrepented sin. It is time to send him to hell. It is also, of course, the end of the last act.

32e