Critique of Hair

The production of Hair was a melodrama that focused on the youth of the 1960's, and the tribulations that young people faced. It dealt with what the hippie generation valued most, and also what they feared. The episodic plot chronicled the life of Claude, a young man who was drafted into the Vietnam War, and the tribe, his friends.Although there was not a set story line, the play was a truthful portrayal of the 1960's culture. Stephen F. Austin's production of this famous off Broadway play was well done, and the stage effects only added more imagery to the already graphic portrayal of this award winning play.
When the production of Hair opened in 1968 it opened the doors and began a revolution on Broadway.It was thefirst musical to contain what is now known as rock music.It also dealt with critical situations such as sex, drugs, and the Vietnam War.It was seen as very risqué for its time. It contained many racial and homosexual references, and focused on the action of "free-love".Now as our society has become more desensitized, the play is easily accepted most everywhere.
The cast of Hair did an outstanding job of accurately describing the culture of the 1960's.Their choice of costumes was superior.Every member of the tribe was decked out in flashy colors and hippie attire.Even the actors hair was done up in retro styles.
The cast also made good use of the set with picket signs, incense, and many other props in portraying the youth of the 1960's.Although this play was set over four decades ago, it is still identifiable.We as young adults in our society still struggle with our elders in pursuit of freedom to do what we desire.Adults in our society still believe that teenagers our not responsible enough to handle the consequences of the decisions they choose to make, so they then decide for them, much like in the play.Claude's parents